9-11: Who Is Responsible?
I am not some conspiracy theory nut but they do exist at times. (We wouldn't have laws against conspiracies if they had never happened.) The term itself is a loaded one, often used by right wingers to dismiss claims by lefties.
Also, I'm not saying that 9-11 was an American conspiracy not an attack by Al-Quaeda. But there are so many unanswered questions that everybody's eyebrows should be raised.
Why The Towers Fell, done by Nova, is a non-conspiracy-theory explanation of the collapse of the towers and has interesting footage to watch.
I watched a show with the very first suggestion that there might be a conspiracy involved beforeI became aware of this Nova/PBS documentary linked to in the previous paragraph. It's an episode of The Fifth Estate called Conspiracy Theories and conspiracy, or not, - just in passing - it's odd that Bush senior was in a meeting with a cousin (or brother) of Osama when the towers got hit, isn't it?
Remember, I am not convinced, just suspicious! But having watched more videos and disasters than I care to remember I have to wonder about many aspects, the collapse of No 7 WTC not being the least.
The US government relies on Popular Mechanics, better known as a geek magazine, for information to refute doubters of the official story. (There are several parts all linked to on this US government site.) I find this strange as it is not a scholarly, scientific, publication but a magazine popularising science and technology. There is a difference.
It is all truly frightening that one can even consider, because of some evidence, the possibility of such monstrous crimes and may indeed seem outlandish. But do consider the track record of Bush&Cheney et al. Many people warned about the seemingly unending human disaster in Iraq before these criminals unleashed the invasion. They did it just the same and we all know how profitable it is for lots of corporations.
Money talks and always has.
If you are interested, have a lot of time to waste, I recommend you watch these videos. (Some of them are quite long) The urls did work when I used them but might not work when you'll try; it has happened to me before. In this case just google the title and you shall find what you're seeking.
Loose Change Second ed. A must see in my opinion.
911 Eyewitness A must see in my opinion.
Listen to the sound of explosions, look at puffs of smoke indicating explosions and listen to a janitor of the WTC giving testimony about an explosion he claims to have heard on the lowest level underground, i.e. where one would place explosives if one wanted to demolish a building in a controlled way, just before he heard the plane slam into the building. The audio tape of a fireman that wasn't released by the government for years (why???) can also be heard.
Controlled Demolitions A must see in my opinion.
9-11 Official report. It does not offer an explanation for the collapse of No7. No plane hit it. Why was it destroyed?
Have a look where No 7 is located
WTC no 7
More About WTC no 7
9-11 True Story
Improbable collapse claims to represent both sides fairly.
Why did it take so long for the pictures of the Pentagon to be released? Why was such a lousy image released at first where one could hardly see any detail? Why is the lawn intact? Didn't the plane skid along the ground before slamming into the Pentagon.
How Building Implosions Work
Scientific Papers And Lots Of Links
Criticism of the conspiracy nuts
Laughable criticsm because the buildings did not collapse that way:
This criticism dismissed here